Fechteler v. Jordan

218 F.2d 865, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 54
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 27, 1955·No. Nos. 11975, 11976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Navy Mutual Aid Association was formed by a group of naval officers in 1879. Its amended by-laws state that it was formed “for the purpose of aiding the families of- deceased members; first, by providing with certainty and promptness a substantial sum for their relief in the most equitable manner, and at as near the actual net cost of insurance as possible; second, by securing for them without cost the pensions to which they may be legally entitled.” (Ass’n Bylaws, Art. I, Sec. 1, as amended (1880).) These are cross appeals from a declaratory judgment that the Association is subject to the provisions of the Life Insurance Act of the District of Columbia, 48 Stat. 1125 et seq., D.C.Code 1951, §§ 35-301 to 35-803, but not subject to the tax on insurance companies provided by Title II of the Act of August 17, 1937, 50 Stat. 675 et seq., D.C.Code 1951, §§ 47-1801 to 47-1808. We think the District Court was clearly right.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fechteler v. Jordan, 218 F.2d 865, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 54 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

218 F.2d 865 (Fechteler v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Federation of Post Office Clerks Ex Rel. Hallbeck v. District of Columbia
173 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1961)