Febres v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Febres v. State

215 So. 3d 144, 2017 WL 1076925, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3785

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 2017

DocketNo. 3D15-2718

StatusPublished

This text of 215 So. 3d 144 (Febres v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Febres v. State, 215 So. 3d 144, 2017 WL 1076925, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3785 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

LOGUE, J.

Juan Manuel Febres appeals the court’s order denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. Because Febres has failed to satisfy the test for postconviction relief under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we affirm. See Mendoza v. State, 81 So.3d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (noting that a strategic or tactical decision is not a valid basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim unless no competent counsel would have employed such tactics).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOGUE, J.

Juan Manuel Febres appeals the court’s order denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. Because Febres has failed to satisfy the test for postconviction relief under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we affirm. See Mendoza v. State, 81 So.3d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (noting that a strategic or tactical decision is not a valid basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim unless no competent counsel would have employed such tactics).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 So. 3d 144, 2017 WL 1076925, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/febres-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack