Febrenbacke v. Straus

2 Ky. Op. 506, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 469
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedSeptember 29, 1868
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ky. Op. 506 (Febrenbacke v. Straus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Febrenbacke v. Straus, 2 Ky. Op. 506, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 469 (Ky. Ct. App. 1868).

Opinion

OPINION OE THE OOURT BY

JuDGKE E.OBERTSON:

The matter set up in the petition was insufficient as a defense, either at law or in equity. The pretended sale of the appellee’s house, though voidable by him, is binding on the appellant by estoppel. And there being no doubt that, as to title, the appellant is the only beneficial party, he is undoubtedly liable for rent or interest.

The injunction was not maintainable even if the matter alleged had been available in the proper mode and at the proper time. No good reason for suffering judgment by default has been shown. The matter ought to have been pleaded as a defense to the action and is not therefore now cognisable in equity.

The injunction was, therefore, properly dissolved. And we perceive no error in the judgment. The ostensible vendee of appellee’s house was a party, and the house sold under execution was 1 not the same, and thus all parties interested are concluded.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ky. Op. 506, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/febrenbacke-v-straus-kyctapp-1868.