Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp.

162 So. 2d 517, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2981

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 1964

DocketNo. 33162

StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 2d 517 (Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp., 162 So. 2d 517, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2981 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 29, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[518]*518pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 29, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis[518]*518pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 2d 517, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/febles-v-talisman-sugar-corp-fla-1964.