Feazell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Feazell v. State

115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420394, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-2714

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 So. 3d 1045 (Feazell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feazell v. State, 115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420394, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to withdraw plea post-sentencing in this case was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (motion must be filed within thirty days of date sentence rendered). As a result, the trial eourt never had jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the motion. Bermudez v. State, 901 So.2d 981, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); James v. State, 12 So.3d 1290 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); McKnight v. State, 964 So.2d 803, 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Dayton v. State, 867 So.2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). On remand, the order denying appellant’s motion shall be modified to reflect denial was due to lack of jurisdiction.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

WARNER, STEVENSON and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to withdraw plea post-sentencing in this case was untimely filed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(l) (motion must be filed within thirty days of date sentence rendered). As a result, the trial eourt never had jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the motion. Bermudez v. State, 901 So.2d 981, 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Golden v. State, 84 So.3d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); James v. State, 12 So.3d 1290 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); McKnight v. State, 964 So.2d 803, 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Dayton v. State, 867 So.2d 647 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). On remand, the order denying appellant’s motion shall be modified to reflect denial was due to lack of jurisdiction.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

WARNER, STEVENSON and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 2420394, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feazell-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack