Feazell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Feazell v. State

908 So. 2d 1168, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13443, 2005 WL 2016953

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 2005

DocketNo. 2D05-2445

StatusPublished

This text of 908 So. 2d 1168 (Feazell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feazell v. State, 908 So. 2d 1168, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13443, 2005 WL 2016953 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

As this court did in Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

WHATLEY, SALCINES, and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI