Feazell v. State
908 So. 2d 1168, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13443, 2005 WL 2016953
Opinion
Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
As this court did in Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feazell v. State, 908 So. 2d 1168, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13443, 2005 WL 2016953 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
908 So. 2d 1168 (Feazell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Middleton v. State
721 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Teal v. State
862 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)