Feazell v. Garrett

Roanoke County Circuit Court

Feazell v. Garrett

56 Va. Cir. 535, 2001 WL 34038606, 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 498

CourtRoanoke County Circuit Court

DecidedNovember 26, 2001

DocketCase No. CH01-755

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Va. Cir. 535 (Feazell v. Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Roanoke County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feazell v. Garrett, 56 Va. Cir. 535, 2001 WL 34038606, 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 498 (Va. Super. Ct. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

By Judge Robert p. Doherty, Jr.

This matter came before the Court on Mr. Garrett’s appeal from Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court. Mr. Garrett asked the court to consider the income of Nancy Feazell in determining the child support payable for his son, Michael Ferguson. He argues that Mrs. Feazell has voluntarily placed herself in the place of a parent to Michael and under the doctrine of in loco parentis owes support.

The Court agrees that Mrs. Feazell is acting in loco parentis. Mrs. Feazell and the child’s mother share joint custody. As custodian, she provides him with food, shelter, and education. This satisfies her obligation as custodian, where she acts in place of a parent. She has no additional statutory duty to provide child support.

Both natural parents owe a duty of support to this child. Russell v. Russell, 35 Va. App. 360, 361 (2001); N.P.A. v. W.B.A., 8 Va. App. 246, 249 (1989). Under the guidelines, the child’s biological mother is exempt from support obligations because she receives Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Mrs. Feazell will not be included. The Court finds that Mr. Garrett has been underemployed and imputes an income of $1530 per month to him and orders him to pay $282 per month in child support which includes $50 a month for health insurance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By Judge Robert p. Doherty, Jr.

This matter came before the Court on Mr. Garrett’s appeal from Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court. Mr. Garrett asked the court to consider the income of Nancy Feazell in determining the child support payable for his son, Michael Ferguson. He argues that Mrs. Feazell has voluntarily placed herself in the place of a parent to Michael and under the doctrine of in loco parentis owes support.

The Court agrees that Mrs. Feazell is acting in loco parentis. Mrs. Feazell and the child’s mother share joint custody. As custodian, she provides him with food, shelter, and education. This satisfies her obligation as custodian, where she acts in place of a parent. She has no additional statutory duty to provide child support.

Both natural parents owe a duty of support to this child. Russell v. Russell, 35 Va. App. 360, 361 (2001); N.P.A. v. W.B.A., 8 Va. App. 246, 249 (1989). Under the guidelines, the child’s biological mother is exempt from support obligations because she receives Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Mrs. Feazell will not be included. The Court finds that Mr. Garrett has been underemployed and imputes an income of $1530 per month to him and orders him to pay $282 per month in child support which includes $50 a month for health insurance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Va. Cir. 535, 2001 WL 34038606, 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feazell-v-garrett-vaccroanokecty-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack