Feazel v. Mills

Ohio Supreme Court

Feazel v. Mills

2009 Ohio 5257, 915 N.E.2d 643, 123 Ohio St. 3d 240

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 6, 2009

Docket2009-0949

StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 5257 (Feazel v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feazel v. Mills, 2009 Ohio 5257, 915 N.E.2d 643, 123 Ohio St. 3d 240 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals issued on April 9, 2009, dismissing the appeal below is vacated on the authority of Walburn v. Dunlap, 121 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-1221, 904 N.E.2d 863, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply Walburn.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals issued on April 9, 2009, dismissing the appeal below is vacated on the authority of Walburn v. Dunlap, 121 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-1221, 904 N.E.2d 863, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply Walburn.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 5257, 915 N.E.2d 643, 123 Ohio St. 3d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feazel-v-mills-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack