Feazel v. Mills

Ohio Supreme Court

Feazel v. Mills

2009 Ohio 5257, 915 N.E.2d 643, 123 Ohio St. 3d 240

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 6, 2009·No. 2009-0949·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals issued on April 9, 2009, dismissing the appeal below is vacated on the authority of Walburn v. Dunlap, 121 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-1221, 904 N.E.2d 863, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply Walburn.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals issued on April 9, 2009, dismissing the appeal below is vacated on the authority of Walburn v. Dunlap, 121 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-1221, 904 N.E.2d 863, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply Walburn.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Feazel v. Mills, 2009 Ohio 5257, 915 N.E.2d 643, 123 Ohio St. 3d 240 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 5257 (Feazel v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related