Feature Sports, Inc. v. United States

374 F.2d 890, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1023, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7003
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 23, 1967·No. 22396_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Faithful to our very restrictive mandate to determine on the existing record whether, before the initial deposit with Bank Germann there was any contract between Feature Sports, Inc. and Johansson which provided for the delivery of the advances of $250,000 into an escrow account, Johansson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 336 F.2d 809, 816, the Trial Judge did just that. With an ample articulation of the reasons leading to it, the Judge concluded and flatly declared that no such contract existed.

That finding, we earlier said, would put an end to the Taxpayer’s case. 1 336 F.2d 809, 817.

And so it does.

Affirmed.

1

. This is the law of the case. See Lincoln Nat’l Life Ins. Co. v. Roosth, 5 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 110 (en banc), cert, denied 372 U.S. 912, 83 S.Ct. 726, 9 L.Ed.2d 720.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feature Sports, Inc. v. United States, 374 F.2d 890, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1023, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7003 (5th Cir. 1967).

374 F.2d 890 (Feature Sports, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schreck v. United States
301 F. Supp. 1265 (D. Maryland, 1969)