Feature Sports, Inc. v. United States
This text of 374 F.2d 890 (Feature Sports, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Faithful to our very restrictive mandate to determine on the existing record whether, before the initial deposit with Bank Germann there was any contract between Feature Sports, Inc. and Johansson which provided for the delivery of the advances of $250,000 into an escrow account, Johansson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 336 F.2d 809, 816, the Trial Judge did just that. With an ample articulation of the reasons leading to it, the Judge concluded and flatly declared that no such contract existed.
That finding, we earlier said, would put an end to the Taxpayer’s case. 1 336 F.2d 809, 817.
And so it does.
Affirmed.
. This is the law of the case. See Lincoln Nat’l Life Ins. Co. v. Roosth, 5 Cir. 1962, 306 F.2d 110 (en banc), cert, denied 372 U.S. 912, 83 S.Ct. 726, 9 L.Ed.2d 720.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 F.2d 890, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1023, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feature-sports-inc-v-united-states-ca5-1967.