Featherstone v. De La Vergne Refrigerating Mach. Co.

80 F. 918, 26 C.C.A. 246, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 80 F. 918 (Featherstone v. De La Vergne Refrigerating Mach. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Featherstone v. De La Vergne Refrigerating Mach. Co., 80 F. 918, 26 C.C.A. 246, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270 (7th Cir. 1897).

Opinion

SHOWALTER, Circuit Judge

(after the foregoing recital). For reasons quite fully set forth in Standard Elevator Co. v. Crane Elevator Co., 22 C. C. A. 549, 76 Fed. 767, my individual opinion is’ that the decree of January 21, 1895, was the “final decision” so far as concerns the ownership, validity, and infringement of the patent. On this view that part of the decree of August 22, 1895, which declares the former decree as touching the points of ownership, validity, and infringement to be “confirmed,” is without legal effect, and no one of the assignments of error could be even inquired into. But assuming the former decree to have been in the respects mentioned interlocutory, it is the opinion of the court that there is no substantial error in the record. The patent in controversy concerns a force pump to be used in artificial refrigeration. Anhydrous ammonia in the gaseous state is by the downward movement of a solid pisten head first compressed in the cylinder which constitutes the body of the pump, and then expelled through the outlet valve into pipes and chambers, whereby it is first condensed into the liquid form, then conducted into the refrigerating room, where it expands again into the gaseous state, taking up in so doing the heat from surrounding objects, thence conducted back again to the inlet valve of the pump, and drawn once more into the cylinder by the upward movement of the aforementioned piston head, to be again compressed by the return movement and sent again on- the round described. The piston head is moved up and down by steam or some external force. The [921]*921operation of such a pump produces, maintains, and controls the state •of temperature necessary for the preservation of the property in the refrigerating room, or for manufacturing operations there carried ■on. Boyle’s patent shows two diagrams as below:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Elevator Co. v. Crane Elevator Co.
76 F. 767 (Seventh Circuit, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F. 918, 26 C.C.A. 246, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/featherstone-v-de-la-vergne-refrigerating-mach-co-ca7-1897.