Feather v. State
278 S.W.3d 711, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 699, 2009 WL 791486
Opinion
ORDER
Daniel J. Feather II appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feather v. State, 278 S.W.3d 711, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 699, 2009 WL 791486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
278 S.W.3d 711 (Feather v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Progressive Medical, Inc. v. Lasersurge, Inc.
278 S.W.3d 711 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)