Feather v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Feather v. State

278 S.W.3d 711, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 699, 2009 WL 791486

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 24, 2009

DocketED 91464

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 S.W.3d 711 (Feather v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feather v. State, 278 S.W.3d 711, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 699, 2009 WL 791486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel J. Feather II appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel J. Feather II appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 S.W.3d 711, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 699, 2009 WL 791486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feather-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack