Feakins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Feakins v. State

539 So. 2d 1195, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 787, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553, 1989 WL 27938

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 1989

DocketNo. 88-0412

StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 1195 (Feakins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feakins v. State, 539 So. 2d 1195, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 787, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553, 1989 WL 27938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order on motion to set aside sentence and to resentence, holding that appellant’s motion for disqualification of trial judge should have been granted. Our holding renders moot the additional points on appeal posed by appellant. We therefore reverse and remand for another hearing on the motion to set aside appellant’s sentence, to be conducted before a different trial judge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order on motion to set aside sentence and to resentence, holding that appellant’s motion for disqualification of trial judge should have been granted. Our holding renders moot the additional points on appeal posed by appellant. We therefore reverse and remand for another hearing on the motion to set aside appellant’s sentence, to be conducted before a different trial judge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 So. 2d 1195, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 787, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553, 1989 WL 27938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feakins-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.