Feagle v. Feagle

108 So. 2d 628
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1959·No. No. A-408·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal from which it appears that the testimony, though conflicting, amply supports the finding of the Chancellor, and the appellant has failed to clearly demonstrate error.

Affirmed on the authority of Travis v. Travis, 1921, 81 Fla. 309, 87 So. 762.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feagle v. Feagle, 108 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

108 So. 2d 628 (Feagle v. Feagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Travis v. Travis
87 So. 762 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)