Feagin v. State
438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1983·No. No. AS-410·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
This appeal from a judgment and sentence entered pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere is dismissed because appellant did not reserve his right to appeal any issue when entering his plea of nolo contendere. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Chapin v. State, 427 So.2d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, if such presentation in the lower court has not been barred by some other limitation.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Feagin v. State, 438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
438 So. 2d 1082 (Feagin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawk v. State
848 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Johnson v. State
449 So. 2d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Poe & Associates, Inc. v. Emberton
438 So. 2d 1082 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)