Feagin v. State
This text of 438 So. 2d 1082 (Feagin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal from a judgment and sentence entered pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere is dismissed because appellant did not reserve his right to appeal any issue when entering his plea of nolo contendere. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Chapin v. State, 427 So.2d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, if such presentation in the lower court has not been barred by some other limitation.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feagin-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.