Feagin v. State

438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 1983
DocketNo. AS-410
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 438 So. 2d 1082 (Feagin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feagin v. State, 438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a judgment and sentence entered pursuant to a plea of nolo contendere is dismissed because appellant did not reserve his right to appeal any issue when entering his plea of nolo contendere. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Chapin v. State, 427 So.2d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1). This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, if such presentation in the lower court has not been barred by some other limitation.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and NIM-MONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawk v. State
848 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Johnson v. State
449 So. 2d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Poe & Associates, Inc. v. Emberton
438 So. 2d 1082 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 So. 2d 1082, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feagin-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.