Feagan v. Aven

Supreme Court of Georgia

Feagan v. Aven

44 Ga. 661

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

(By two judges.) There was no appearance for plaintiff in error. Aven’s Counsel moved to dismiss the writ of error because it was filed in the Clerk’s office one day too late, and the motion was granted. Before the order was made, it was suggested that the last day was a day of thanksgiving proclaimed by the President of the United States. The Court said then it was safer to have the cause dismissed for want of prosecution. 24th February, 1872.

No appearance for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(By two judges.) There was no appearance for plaintiff in error. Aven’s Counsel moved to dismiss the writ of error because it was filed in the Clerk’s office one day too late, and the motion was granted. Before the order was made, it was suggested that the last day was a day of thanksgiving proclaimed by the President of the United States. The Court said then it was safer to have the cause dismissed for want of prosecution. 24th February, 1872.

No appearance for plaintiff in error.

Feagan v. Aven, 44 Ga. 661 (Ga. 1872).

Pincite

44 Ga. 661 (Feagan v. Aven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related