Fdic, as the Receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank v. Fairway Complex Inc. H. Clay Reavis, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

Fdic, as the Receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank v. Fairway Complex Inc. H. Clay Reavis, Jr.

108 F.3d 1384

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 1997

Docket95-56771

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 F.3d 1384 (Fdic, as the Receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank v. Fairway Complex Inc. H. Clay Reavis, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fdic, as the Receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank v. Fairway Complex Inc. H. Clay Reavis, Jr., 108 F.3d 1384 (9th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

108 F.3d 1384

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
FDIC, as the Receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FAIRWAY COMPLEX INC.; H. Clay Reavis, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-56771.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 7, 1997.*
Decided March 11, 1997.

Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Appellant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank, demonstrated in the exhibits to its notice of removal that it had been substituted as a party. Appellant therefore properly removed under 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(B). As the factual circumstances in the case changed between the first and second removal attempts, the common law prohibition against successive removals does not apply. See S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc., 72 F.3d 489, 492-93 (5th Cir.1996).

REVERSED. NO COSTS.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

108 F.3d 1384

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
FDIC, as the Receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FAIRWAY COMPLEX INC.; H. Clay Reavis, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-56771.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 7, 1997.*
Decided March 11, 1997.

Before: FARRIS, KOZINSKI and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Appellant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Pacific Heritage Bank, demonstrated in the exhibits to its notice of removal that it had been substituted as a party. Appellant therefore properly removed under 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(B). As the factual circumstances in the case changed between the first and second removal attempts, the common law prohibition against successive removals does not apply. See S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc., 72 F.3d 489, 492-93 (5th Cir.1996).

REVERSED. NO COSTS.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 F.3d 1384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fdic-as-the-receiver-for-pacific-heritage-bank-v-f-ca9-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack