FCP Entertainment Partners, LLC v. Hal Luftig Company, Inc.

Opinion

SONY cs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT iy ICALLY FILED | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IDOL #: pe oes □□ teins Caen a pare rice: FCP ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, LLC, ee : \ Plaintiff, -against- 22-cv-2768 (LAK) HAL LUFTIG COMPANY, INC., et ano., Defendants. www etm ewe eww □□ eww ew eB em □□ ewe mw ee eee ee HH KX HAL LUFTIG, Plaintiff, -against- 22-cv-3697 (LAK) FCP ENTERTAINMENT PARTNERS, LLC, Defendant. wet se et ee ee ree me ee ee ee ew ee ee ee eee we He HX

ORDER LEwIs A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Each petition fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: a The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See hae v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). O The citizenship of one or more limited liability | mpanies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). fs] The nature and citizenship of one or more businegs entities. Oo The timely removal of the action from state court, Absent the filing, in each case,, on or before May 19, 2022, of an amended petition adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the relevant action will be dismissed. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 11, 2022

Lewis A. Kaplan United T District Jud