FCCI Mutual Insurance v. Schnupp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

FCCI Mutual Insurance v. Schnupp

697 So. 2d 1234, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7857, 1997 WL 386113

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 1997·No. No. 96-609·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

FCCI Mutual Insurance Company and In-terlachen Country Club appeal a decision awarding medical care and treatment, not previously authorized by the appellants, to Donna L. Schnupp. Based upon the pleadings and proof adduced at trial and the manner in which this case was tried before the judge of compensation claims and argued on appeal before this court, we find that there is competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the judge of compensation claims. See Lovell Brothers v. Kittles, 518 So.2d 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The order of the judge of compensation claims is AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur. BENTON, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

FCCI Mutual Insurance Company and In-terlachen Country Club appeal a decision awarding medical care and treatment, not previously authorized by the appellants, to Donna L. Schnupp. Based upon the pleadings and proof adduced at trial and the manner in which this case was tried before the judge of compensation claims and argued on appeal before this court, we find that there is competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the judge of compensation claims. See Lovell Brothers v. Kittles, 518 So.2d 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The order of the judge of compensation claims is AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur. BENTON, J., dissents with written opinion.

FCCI Mutual Insurance v. Schnupp, 697 So. 2d 1234, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7857, 1997 WL 386113 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

697 So. 2d 1234 (FCCI Mutual Insurance v. Schnupp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related