FCCI Mutual Insurance Co. v. Crews
877 So. 2d 746, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 2004 WL 1091132
Opinion
Because the parties and the Judge of Compensation Claims have certified that claimant’s testimony cannot be reconstructed, this cause is reversed and remanded for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
FCCI Mutual Insurance Co. v. Crews, 877 So. 2d 746, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6807, 2004 WL 1091132 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
877 So. 2d 746 (FCCI Mutual Insurance Co. v. Crews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)