Fazzio v. Olmedo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fazzio v. Olmedo

64 A.D.2d 945, 407 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 29, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 945 (Fazzio v. Olmedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fazzio v. Olmedo, 64 A.D.2d 945, 407 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate the petition designating certain of the respondents as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1978, for the party offices in the 59th Assembly District of State Committeeman (Male and Female) and the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 59th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 1978, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The question of residence presents a question of fact. Special Term heard and saw [946]*946the witnesses. We find no basis to disturb its conclusion. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate the petition designating certain of the respondents as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1978, for the party offices in the 59th Assembly District of State Committeeman (Male and Female) and the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 59th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 1978, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The question of residence presents a question of fact. Special Term heard and saw [946]*946the witnesses. We find no basis to disturb its conclusion. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 945, 407 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fazzio-v-olmedo-nyappdiv-1978.