Fazio v. Joy

444 N.E.2d 990, 58 N.Y.2d 674, 458 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3904
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 18, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 444 N.E.2d 990 (Fazio v. Joy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fazio v. Joy, 444 N.E.2d 990, 58 N.Y.2d 674, 458 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3904 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (89 AD2d 604). We emphasize that the proper standard of review of determinations by the Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation and Development is a “rational basis” test (Matter of Asen Bros. & Brook v Leventhal, 54 NY2d 839; Matter of Colton v Berman, 21 NY2d 322, 329).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howard v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development
294 A.D.2d 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Carlen v. Harris
200 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Weitzner v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
190 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Richcar Tavern, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
160 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Sipos v. Mirabel
157 A.D.2d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Pattison v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
143 A.D.2d 191 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Welker v. Scruggs-Leftwich
139 A.D.2d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Lavalle v. Scruggs-Leftwich
133 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Sourian v. Scruggs-Leftwich
126 A.D.2d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Torillo v. Joy
100 A.D.2d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Fishel v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
123 Misc. 2d 841 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 N.E.2d 990, 58 N.Y.2d 674, 458 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fazio-v-joy-ny-1982.