Fazio v. County of Nassau

36 A.D.3d 807, 826 N.Y.S.2d 910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), entered October 4, 2005, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the petitioner failed to establish that she had a reasonable excuse for much of the almost nine-month delay in serving the notice of claim (see Matter of Finneran v City of New York, 228 AD2d 596, 596-597 [1996]). Moreover, the record does not support the petitioner’s contention that the County of Nassau had actual knowledge of the essential facts underlying her claim within 90 days of the accident and therefore would not be substantially prejudiced in preparing a defense if the application were granted (see Matter of Cattell v Town of Brookhaven, 21 AD3d 896 [2005]; Matter of Gillum v County of Nassau, 284 AD2d 533 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petition. Miller, J.P., Crane, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fazio v. County of Nassau, 36 A.D.3d 807, 826 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

36 A.D.3d 807 (Fazio v. County of Nassau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cioffi v. Town of Hempstead
119 A.D.3d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)