Faymor Development Co. v. King
446 U.S. 905, 100 S. Ct. 1828, 64 L. Ed. 2d 256, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2127
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 21, 1980
DocketNo. 79-1178
StatusPublished
Cited by82 cases
This text of 446 U.S. 905 (Faymor Development Co. v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Faymor Development Co. v. King, 446 U.S. 905, 100 S. Ct. 1828, 64 L. Ed. 2d 256, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2127 (1980).
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Strycker’s Bay Neighborhood Council v. Karlen, 444 U. S. 223 (1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCardell v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
794 F.3d 510 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
Galveston Open Government Project v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
17 F. Supp. 3d 599 (S.D. Texas, 2014)
Roeur Van v. Kurt Jones, Warden
475 F.3d 292 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
Glendale Neighborhood Ass'n v. Greensboro Housing Authority
901 F. Supp. 996 (M.D. North Carolina, 1995)
Moore v. Wyoming Medical Center
825 F. Supp. 1531 (D. Wyoming, 1993)
N.A.A.C.P., Boston Chapter v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
817 F.2d 149 (First Circuit, 1987)
Hosey Johnson v. Donald A. Cabana and the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
805 F.2d 579 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Weber v. Dell
804 F.2d 796 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Smith v. Montgomery County, Md.
643 F. Supp. 435 (D. Maryland, 1986)
United States v. Franzen
794 F.2d 314 (Seventh Circuit, 1986)
United States ex rel. Rivera v. Franzen
794 F.2d 314 (Seventh Circuit, 1986)
Fann v. City of Cleveland, Ohio
616 F. Supp. 305 (N.D. Ohio, 1985)
Rogers v. Israel
746 F.2d 1280 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
Michael Crisp v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden
743 F.2d 580 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
Betty Anderson, Arlene Hudson, Cassie Moore and Bertha Daniels v. City of Alpharetta, Georgia, Cassie Moore, Bertha Daniels, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. William Miller
737 F.2d 1530 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Anderson v. City of Alpharetta
737 F.2d 1530 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Alvord v. Wainwright
725 F.2d 1282 (Eleventh Circuit, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Smith
467 A.2d 1307 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
David Dene Martin v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana
711 F.2d 1273 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Caroline Dufrin v. Oakland County Sheriff Johannes Spreen
712 F.2d 1084 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
446 U.S. 905, 100 S. Ct. 1828, 64 L. Ed. 2d 256, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faymor-development-co-v-king-scotus-1980.