Fayerweather v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fayerweather v. State

303 So. 2d 34, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8229

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 1974·No. No. 74-235·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in charging and sentencing the appellant under § 811.-16, Fla.Stat., rather than under § 817.67 (1), Fla.Stat. The appellant’s contention is that he should have been charged and sentenced under the latter statute. The appellant has cited Lore v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 267 So.2d 699 and Strada v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 267 So.2d 702 in support of this proposition.

We think, however, that the better reasoning appears in State v. McCurdy, Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 92 and McConnell v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 298 So.2d 550, and we affirm upon the authority of the views therein expressed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in charging and sentencing the appellant under § 811.-16, Fla.Stat., rather than under § 817.67 (1), Fla.Stat. The appellant’s contention is that he should have been charged and sentenced under the latter statute. The appellant has cited Lore v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 267 So.2d 699 and Strada v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 267 So.2d 702 in support of this proposition.

We think, however, that the better reasoning appears in State v. McCurdy, Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 92 and McConnell v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 298 So.2d 550, and we affirm upon the authority of the views therein expressed.

Affirmed.

Fayerweather v. State, 303 So. 2d 34, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8229 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

303 So. 2d 34 (Fayerweather v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related