Fayerweather v. Ritch

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Fayerweather v. Ritch

94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 26, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 94 F. 1021 (Fayerweather v. Ritch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fayerweather v. Ritch, 94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118 (circtsdny 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion to amend is granted as prayed. Tills practically reopens the whole case, and all parties defendant will have 20 days’ time after service of the amended bill to plead, answer, or demur thereto. The case being thus reopened, a plea or a demurrer, if interposed, will be considered as a. first dilatory pleading, and, in the event of its being overruled, the party interposing it will be allowed to answer. The defendants trustees of Hamilton College may have 20 days to elect whether it will plead, answer, or demur to (he amended bill, or whether it will stand on the evidence already taken on the issues raised by its present plea and replication thereto, and the submission thereof heretofore made to this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion to amend is granted as prayed. Tills practically reopens the whole case, and all parties defendant will have 20 days’ time after service of the amended bill to plead, answer, or demur thereto. The case being thus reopened, a plea or a demurrer, if interposed, will be considered as a. first dilatory pleading, and, in the event of its being overruled, the party interposing it will be allowed to answer. The defendants trustees of Hamilton College may have 20 days to elect whether it will plead, answer, or demur to (he amended bill, or whether it will stand on the evidence already taken on the issues raised by its present plea and replication thereto, and the submission thereof heretofore made to this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fayerweather-v-ritch-circtsdny-1899.