Fayant v. ALK-Abello, Inc.
This text of Fayant v. ALK-Abello, Inc. (Fayant v. ALK-Abello, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
LOUIS FAYANT, CV 24-86-H-DWM Plaintiff, vs. ORDER
ALK-ABELLO, INC. and JOHN DOES I-XXX, Defendants.
On May 31, 2024, Plaintiff Louis Fayant sued his employer, Defendant ALK-Abello, Inc., for wrongful discharge, discrimination, and infliction of emotional distress in the Montana First Judicial District Court. (See Docs. 1, 1-1.) On December 20, 2024, the case was removed from state court. (Doc. 1.) On January 29, 2025, ALK-Abello, Inc. moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 13.) In response, Fayant filed an Amended Complaint. (Doc. 19.) Because “an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading,” Koala v. Khosla, 931 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2019),
IT IS ORDERED that ALK-Abello, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, (Doc. 13), is DENIED as MOOT. ALK-Abello must answer the Amended Complaint or once again move to dismiss by the deadline provided in Rule 12(a). DATED this Lo day of February, 2025. WA Donald W. Molloy, District Judge Unit¢d States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fayant v. ALK-Abello, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fayant-v-alk-abello-inc-mtd-2025.