Fayad v. Mercy Hospital, Inc.

773 So. 2d 1244, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16220, 2000 WL 1816691
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1629·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant failed to establish the elements necessary for the entry of a temporary injunction, South Fla. Limousines, Inc. v. Broward County Aviation Dept., 512 So.2d 1059, 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)(“In order for a temporary injunction to be granted, the plaintiff must prove that: (1) he will suffer irreparable harm unless the status quo is maintained; (2) he has no adequate remedy at law; (3) he has a clear legal right to the relief requested; and (4) a temporary injunction will serve the public interest.”), the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant’s motion for temporary injunction. See Perry & Co. v. First Sec. Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 654 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fayad v. Mercy Hospital, Inc., 773 So. 2d 1244, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16220, 2000 WL 1816691 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

773 So. 2d 1244 (Fayad v. Mercy Hospital, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

THE WEISBEIN TEAM, P.A., etc. v. DAVID A. KURZ
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLP
137 So. 3d 1081 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)