Fay v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Fay v. State

84 So. 926, 17 Ala. App. 691

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 1919·No. 1 Div. 330.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant, together with Eva Bryant, alias Lillian Hill, was indicted for the offense of living together in a state of adultery or fornication. A severance was granted, and the defendant was adjudged guilty as charged iand duly sentenced as provided by law. From this judgment of conviction this appeal is taken. The appeal is on the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired. The record before us discloses that the entire proceedings in the circuit court were regular and free from error, and the judgment is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant, together with Eva Bryant, alias Lillian Hill, was indicted for the offense of living together in a state of adultery or fornication. A severance was granted, and the defendant was adjudged guilty as charged iand duly sentenced as provided by law. From this judgment of conviction this appeal is taken. The appeal is on the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing a bill of exceptions has expired. The record before us discloses that the entire proceedings in the circuit court were regular and free from error, and the judgment is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Fay v. State, 84 So. 926, 17 Ala. App. 691 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

84 So. 926 (Fay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.