Fay v. Manhattan Railway Co.

38 N.Y.S. 1143, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 867

This text of 38 N.Y.S. 1143 (Fay v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fay v. Manhattan Railway Co., 38 N.Y.S. 1143, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are all of opinion that the evidence in this case is entirely insufficient to sustain the decision and judgment. A new trial must be awarded, because the evidence is not of such a character as would justify a modification The weight of evidence is so greatly in favor of the defendants that we must either dismiss the complaint or award a new trial. As the plaintiff may be able to make out a stronger case upon another hearing, the latter course should be adopted. The judgment will therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 N.Y.S. 1143, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fay-v-manhattan-railway-co-nyappdiv-1896.