Fay v. Hudson Navigation Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fay v. Hudson Navigation Co.

170 A.D. 962, 155 N.Y.S. 1105

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D. 962 (Fay v. Hudson Navigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fay v. Hudson Navigation Co., 170 A.D. 962, 155 N.Y.S. 1105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The finding that the defendant was negligent is not sustained by the evidence. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, and the finding that the defendant was negligent is reversed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, and finding that the defendant was guilty of negligence reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The finding that the defendant was negligent is not sustained by the evidence. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, and the finding that the defendant was negligent is reversed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, and finding that the defendant was guilty of negligence reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D. 962, 155 N.Y.S. 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fay-v-hudson-navigation-co-nyappdiv-1915.