Fay v. Goulding

27 Mass. 122
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Mass. 122 (Fay v. Goulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fay v. Goulding, 27 Mass. 122 (Mass. 1830).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the action is brought by the payee, this is not a material variance. If the plaintiff were an indorsee it would have been necessary to allege that the note was payable to the payee or his order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Mass. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fay-v-goulding-mass-1830.