Fay v. DeCamp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fay v. DeCamp

232 A.D. 6, 248 N.Y.S. 472, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13713

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 6 (Fay v. DeCamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fay v. DeCamp, 232 A.D. 6, 248 N.Y.S. 472, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the verdict reinstated, upon the ground that we conclude the Workmen’s Compensation Law did not apply to the servant of the master during the period of her journey from the place of her employment in Rye, N. Y., to the place of employ[7]*7ment at Old Forge, N. Y., and the master’s liability was not relieved for negligence of his chauffeur until the plaintiff undertook her duties at the place to which the insurance of the master’s employees attached.

Present — Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.; Martin, J., dissents.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and verdict reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the verdict reinstated, upon the ground that we conclude the Workmen’s Compensation Law did not apply to the servant of the master during the period of her journey from the place of her employment in Rye, N. Y., to the place of employ[7]*7ment at Old Forge, N. Y., and the master’s liability was not relieved for negligence of his chauffeur until the plaintiff undertook her duties at the place to which the insurance of the master’s employees attached.

Present — Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.; Martin, J., dissents.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements, and verdict reinstated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 6, 248 N.Y.S. 472, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fay-v-decamp-nyappdiv-1931.