Faxon v. Russell

Supreme Court

Faxon v. Russell

154 U.S. 644, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1091, 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1377

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 20, 1879·No. No. 846·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

announced the judgment of the court.

The judgment in this ease is reversed upon the authority of Arthur v. Davies, 96 U. S. 135, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this decision. Upon another trial, however, no allowances can be made for the reduction of ten per cent claimed under Sec. 2. of the act of June 6, 1872, (17 Stat. 232,).that point having been decided adversely to the plaintiff in error in Arthur v. Rheims, 96 U. S. 143. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

announced the judgment of the court.

The judgment in this ease is reversed upon the authority of Arthur v. Davies, 96 U. S. 135, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this decision. Upon another trial, however, no allowances can be made for the reduction of ten per cent claimed under Sec. 2. of the act of June 6, 1872, (17 Stat. 232,).that point having been decided adversely to the plaintiff in error in Arthur v. Rheims, 96 U. S. 143. Reversed.

Faxon v. Russell, 154 U.S. 644, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1091, 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1377 (1879).

Pincite

154 U.S. 644 (Faxon v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related