Faxon v. Russell

Supreme Court

Faxon v. Russell

154 U.S. 644, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1091, 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1377

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 20, 1879

DocketNo. 846

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 154 U.S. 644 (Faxon v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faxon v. Russell, 154 U.S. 644, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1091, 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1377 (1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

announced the judgment of the court.

The judgment in this ease is reversed upon the authority of Arthur v. Davies, 96 U. S. 135, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this decision. Upon another trial, however, no allowances can be made for the reduction of ten per cent claimed under Sec. 2. of the act of June 6, 1872, (17 Stat. 232,).that point having been decided adversely to the plaintiff in error in Arthur v. Rheims, 96 U. S. 143. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

announced the judgment of the court.

The judgment in this ease is reversed upon the authority of Arthur v. Davies, 96 U. S. 135, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this decision. Upon another trial, however, no allowances can be made for the reduction of ten per cent claimed under Sec. 2. of the act of June 6, 1872, (17 Stat. 232,).that point having been decided adversely to the plaintiff in error in Arthur v. Rheims, 96 U. S. 143. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 U.S. 644, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1091, 1879 U.S. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faxon-v-russell-scotus-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack