Faxon v. Hollis

13 Mass. 427
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 13 Mass. 427 (Faxon v. Hollis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faxon v. Hollis, 13 Mass. 427 (Mass. 1816).

Opinion

Parker, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court. The evidence admitted in the trial of this cause, to prove the charges in the account, is such as, according to the usage of the country from its early periods, has been sanctioned by the Courts. Indeed, although of a dangerous nature, it is necessary for the security of tradesmen and small dealers, who are generally unable to support clerks, on whose testimony they might establish their claims. Those who deal with such people should make frequent settlements and take discharges, or they may be exposed to imposition.

It is no objection to the book received in evidence in this case, that it was kept in the leger form ; for such is the way in which ordinary mechanics, especially in the country, make their charges ; having a separate page for each of their customers. Such a form, however, used by a shopkeeper, who is in the habit of making many entries in the course of a day, would be liable to more suspicion.

The entries in this book may be considered original, although transcribed from a slate; the slate containing* merely memoranda, and not being intended to be permanent.

We think, upon the whole, that this book was proper for the in spection of the jury ; and, as they have been satisfied with it as evidence of the plaintiff’s demand, there is no cause to set aside their verdict.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. Hammond & Sons
79 S.E. 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Samuel Wymond Cooperage Co. v. Thompson
8 Ohio N.P. 347 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1900)
Kennedy v. Dodge
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 360 (Lucas Circuit Court, 1899)
Kennedy v. Dodge
19 Ohio C.C. 425 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1899)
Missouri Electric Light & Power Co. v. Carmody
72 Mo. App. 534 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
Wilber v. Scherer
41 N.E. 837 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1895)
Chicago Lumbering Co. v. Hewitt
64 F. 314 (Sixth Circuit, 1894)
Fleming v. Yost
36 N.E. 705 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Culver v. Marks
23 N.E. 1086 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
State v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.
8 A. 290 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1887)
In the Matter of McGoldrick v. . Traphagen
88 N.Y. 334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1882)
Silver v. Worcester
72 Me. 322 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1881)
Redlich v. Bauerlee
98 Ill. 134 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1880)
State v. Shinborn
46 N.H. 497 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1866)
Jackson v. Evans
8 Mich. 476 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1857)
Harwood v. Mulry
74 Mass. 250 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1857)
Towle v. Blake
38 Me. 95 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1854)
Kent v. Garvin
67 Mass. 148 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1854)
Barker v. Haskell
63 Mass. 218 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1852)
Dwinel v. Pottle
31 Me. 167 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Mass. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faxon-v-hollis-mass-1816.