Faxon v. Durant
This text of 50 Mass. 339 (Faxon v. Durant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The instruction, we think, was right. A con sideration is not necessary to give effect to a gift. A gift of personal property, accompanied by actual delivery, passes the [341]*341property as against the donor and his heirs. 2 Bl. Com. 441. 4 Dane Ab. 123. Whether the watch was embraced in the assignment or not, by referring to the schedule as it was, or as it should be amended, if the debtor gave the watch to the assignee, and delivered it, referring to the assignment, as indicating that he should have the proceeds, in trust for the creditors, the legal property vested in the plaintiff.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 Mass. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faxon-v-durant-mass-1845.