Fawley v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6930
BENJAMIN WILLIAM FAWLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM E. JOHNSON, Esquire; CHRISTOPHER J. COLLINS, Esquire; JOHN S. GILL, Commonwealth Attorney; JOHN C. BULLARO, Special Prosecutor; WILLIAM H. SHAW, III, Judge, Mathews County Circuit Court; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; COUNTY OF MATHEWS, Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00175-MSD-FBS)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin William Fawley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Benjamin William Fawley appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Fawley v. Johnson, No. 2:10-cv-
00175-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. June 24, 2010). We deny Fawley’s motion
to allow documents, and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fawley v. Johnson (Fawley v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.