Fawaad v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Fawaad v. State

624 So. 2d 1089, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 236, 1993 WL 56261

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 5, 1993·No. CR-91-1965·Published

Opinion

MONTIEL, Judge.

Mateen Fawaad, a/k/a Jeffrey Bell, appeals the denial of his Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition attacking his robbery conviction. The trial court denied the petition after a hearing. However, the trial court failed to specify the reasons for its denial of the petition. Therefore, this cause is remanded with directions that the trial court make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. See also Henderson v. State, 570 So.2d 879 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). A return to remand shall be filed with this court in 60 days of the date of this opinion.

[1090]*1090REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MONTIEL, Judge.

Mateen Fawaad, a/k/a Jeffrey Bell, appeals the denial of his Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition attacking his robbery conviction. The trial court denied the petition after a hearing. However, the trial court failed to specify the reasons for its denial of the petition. Therefore, this cause is remanded with directions that the trial court make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. See also Henderson v. State, 570 So.2d 879 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). A return to remand shall be filed with this court in 60 days of the date of this opinion.

[1090]*1090REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Fawaad v. State, 624 So. 2d 1089, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 236, 1993 WL 56261 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

624 So. 2d 1089 (Fawaad v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related