Faver v. State

136 S.E. 335, 36 Ga. App. 297, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 31
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1927·No. 17748·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Upon the authority of Cooley v. State, 152 Ga. 469 (3), the judgment overruling the motion for new trial is affirmed. See also Carter v. State, 7 Ga. App. 42 (65 S. E. 1090); Tucker v. State, 29 Ga. App. 221 (1) (114 S. E. 583).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faver v. State, 136 S.E. 335, 36 Ga. App. 297, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 31 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

136 S.E. 335 (Faver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooley v. State
110 S.E. 449 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Carter v. State
65 S.E. 1090 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Tucker v. State
114 S.E. 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)