Favell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Favell v. State

520 S.W.3d 825, 2017 WL 2644041, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 604

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2017·No. No. ED 104672·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

John G. Favell appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

John G. Favell appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Favell v. State, 520 S.W.3d 825, 2017 WL 2644041, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 604 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

520 S.W.3d 825 (Favell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.