Fauvell v. Samson

61 A.D.3d 714, 877 N.Y.S.2d 194
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 2009·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated April 22, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This action arises out of an intersection collision between a car that the defendant James Samson was driving and a bicycle on which the plaintiff was riding. It is undisputed that the plaintiff was riding her bicycle southbound and against traffic on Smith Street, a one-way street in Brooklyn, when she collided with the car, which was traveling eastbound on Union Street through the intersection with Smith Street. Inasmuch as the fault for the accident depends, in part, on whether Samson drove through a red signal when entering the intersection (see [715]*715Ramos v Triboro Coach Corp., 31 AD3d 625 [2006]), and as there are triable issues of fact as to whether he did so, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Mastro, J.E, Fisher, Florio and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fauvell v. Samson, 61 A.D.3d 714, 877 N.Y.S.2d 194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

61 A.D.3d 714 (Fauvell v. Samson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wynter v. City of New York
2019 NY Slip Op 4993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Napolitano v. Sanderson
2018 NY Slip Op 8943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Jung Geun Lee v. Mason
139 A.D.3d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Chuachingco v. Christ
132 A.D.3d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)