Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran

Court of Appeals of Texas

Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran

DecidedApril 7, 2005

Docket13-04-00266-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran (Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-04-266-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

FAUSTINO VASQUEZ III, Appellant,

v.

CLAUDIA YVONNE MORAN, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, FAUSTINO VASQUEZ III, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-02-1112-C. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On February 24, 2005, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 7th day of April, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-04-266-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

FAUSTINO VASQUEZ III, Appellant,

v.

CLAUDIA YVONNE MORAN, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, FAUSTINO VASQUEZ III, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-02-1112-C. No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On February 24, 2005, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this Court’s notice, and appellant’s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 7th day of April, 2005.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Faustino Vasquez, III v. Claudia Yvonne Moran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faustino-vasquez-iii-v-claudia-yvonne-moran-texapp-2005.