Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Hebert
474 So. 2d 1295, 1985 La. LEXIS 9306
This text of 474 So. 2d 1295 (Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Hebert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Hebert, 474 So. 2d 1295, 1985 La. LEXIS 9306 (La. 1985).
Opinion
FAUSTINA PIPE LINE COMPANY
v.
John Austin HEBERT, Annabelle Hebert Sonnier, et al.
FAUSTINA PIPE LINE COMPANY
v.
Percy HEBERT, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied.
DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
BLANCHE, J., would grant the writ on the issue of severance damages. The mere existence of a pipeline absent any evidentiary support of damage will not support an award for severance damages. Furthermore, encasement costs of a pipeline under unplanned streets in an imaginary subdivision is speculative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
474 So. 2d 1295, 1985 La. LEXIS 9306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faustina-pipe-line-company-v-hebert-la-1985.