Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard

499 So. 2d 1014, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7780
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 8, 1986
DocketNo. 85-943
StatusPublished

This text of 499 So. 2d 1014 (Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard, 499 So. 2d 1014, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7780 (La. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Romero, et ux, 499 So.2d 1009 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Defendants-appellants are to bear all costs of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Romero
499 So. 2d 1009 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
499 So. 2d 1014, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faustina-pipe-line-co-v-broussard-lactapp-1986.