Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard
499 So. 2d 1014, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7780
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8577 →
Opinion
For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Romero, et ux, 499 So.2d 1009 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Defendants-appellants are to bear all costs of this appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard, 499 So. 2d 1014, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7780 (La. Ct. App. 1986).
499 So. 2d 1014 (Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Romero
499 So. 2d 1009 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)