Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Faust v. State

Faust v. State

178 S.E. 188, 50 Ga. App. 406, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 341
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
Docket24511
StatusPublished

This text of 178 S.E. 188 (Faust v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faust v. State, 178 S.E. 188, 50 Ga. App. 406, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 341 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Guerry, J.

No error of law is complained of. There is direct evidence of the defendant’s guilt. The court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. James R. Tenable, Frank A. Bowers, J. B. Wood, Robert Mc-Ginley, for plaintiff in error. John S. McClelland, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 S.E. 188, 50 Ga. App. 406, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-v-state-gactapp-1935.