Faust v. State

573 So. 2d 448, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1991 WL 9388
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 1, 1991
DocketNo. 90-01757
StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 448 (Faust v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faust v. State, 573 So. 2d 448, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1991 WL 9388 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that his convictions for possession and purchases of cocaine were based upon the same quantity of cocaine and so are improper under V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). We are unable to consider this argument because the appellant pled guilty to the charges. See Ford v. State, 556 So.2d 483 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant to raise this issue by collateral review. In the remaining cases on appeal, the appellant’s judgments and sentences are affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. State
556 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
V.A.A. v. State
561 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 448, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1991 WL 9388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.