Faust v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faust v. Rice

247 A.D. 877

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order granting defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of order upon payment of said costs and the ten dollars costs awarded at Special Term. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of order upon payment of said costs and the ten dollars costs awarded at Special Term. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Faust v. Rice, 247 A.D. 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 877 (Faust v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.