Faust v. Gore
This text of 230 N.W. 953 (Faust v. Gore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of being hit by a golf ball driven by defendant Gore. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the trial court sustained a motion of defendant city of Lincoln for a directed verdict. At the conclusion of all the testimony a motion for a directed verdict by the Antelope Golf Club was sustained. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Gore in the sum of one dollar, and plaintiff has appealed.
We have carefully examined the record and find the same to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore
Affiemed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 N.W. 953, 119 Neb. 883, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-v-gore-neb-1930.