Faust v. Faust
This text of Faust v. Faust (Faust v. Faust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CONNIE FAUST,1 § § No. 220, 2020 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below–Family Court § of the State of Delaware BRAD FAUST, § § File No. CN17-04510 Petitioner Below, § Petition No. 17-23293 Appellee. § § §
Submitted: January 27, 2021 Decided: February 8, 2021
ORDER
It appears to the Court that, on January 12, 2021, the Clerk of the Court issued
a notice, sent by certified mail, to the appellant, Connie Faust, to show cause why
her appeal should not be dismissed for her failure to file an opening brief and
appendix. The United States Postal Service tracking information sheet indicates that
the notice was delivered to an individual at Faust’s address on January 16, 2021. A
timely response to the notice to show cause was due on or before January 26, 2021.
To date, Faust has not responded to the notice to show cause, nor has she filed an
opening brief. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Faust v. Faust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-v-faust-del-2021.