Faust v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 950, 30 McGrath 265
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 7, 1874
StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 950 (Faust v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faust v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 950, 30 McGrath 265 (Mich. 1874).

Opinion

To require respondent to sign a bill of exceptions to bring up for review on writ of error proceedings on habeas corpus.

Denied October 7, 1874.

Held, that the proper rexnedy was by certiorari, or by habeas corpus in the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 McGrath 950, 30 McGrath 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-v-circuit-judge-mich-1874.