Faust Auto Service, Inc. v. New London Motor Freight, Inc.
This text of 250 A.D. 855 (Faust Auto Service, Inc. v. New London Motor Freight, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Final orders entered in separate proceedings pursuant to section 696 of the Civil Practice Act, and determining that the interest of appellant — a conditional vendor — in a motor truck is subordinate to respondents, levying creditors of the conditional vendee, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. The law of Connecticut controls. (See Commercial Credit Corporation v. Carlson, 114 Conn. 514; 159 A. 352.) Present — 'Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 855, 294 N.Y.S. 806, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faust-auto-service-inc-v-new-london-motor-freight-inc-nyappdiv-1937.