Faust Auto Service, Inc. v. New London Motor Freight, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faust Auto Service, Inc. v. New London Motor Freight, Inc.

250 A.D. 855, 294 N.Y.S. 806, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9409

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 5, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Final orders entered in separate proceedings pursuant to section 696 of the Civil Practice Act, and determining that the interest of appellant — a conditional vendor — in a motor truck is subordinate to respondents, levying creditors of the conditional vendee, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. The law of Connecticut controls. (See Commercial Credit Corporation v. Carlson, 114 Conn. 514; 159 A. 352.) Present — 'Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Final orders entered in separate proceedings pursuant to section 696 of the Civil Practice Act, and determining that the interest of appellant — a conditional vendor — in a motor truck is subordinate to respondents, levying creditors of the conditional vendee, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. The law of Connecticut controls. (See Commercial Credit Corporation v. Carlson, 114 Conn. 514; 159 A. 352.) Present — 'Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Faust Auto Service, Inc. v. New London Motor Freight, Inc., 250 A.D. 855, 294 N.Y.S. 806, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 855 (Faust Auto Service, Inc. v. New London Motor Freight, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related